Free tool

Build an MCP Server in Any Language

Eight languages, eight SDKs at very different levels of maturity, and one working example each. Pick yours.

Whatever you build it in, nobody can see it yet.

The language is the easy decision. Getting someone to try your server is the hard one — MCP Showcase turns any MCP endpoint into a live playground with documentation for every tool.

How it works

link
Pick your language

Including whether it has an officially maintained SDK, which varies more than you would expect.

play_circle
Copy a working tool

Each page shows a complete tool definition in that language, not pseudocode.

checklist
Test before you connect an agent

The MCP Inspector confirms the handshake and shows exactly what an agent will see.

Eight languages, eight very different SDK stories

The protocol is identical everywhere — tools, resources and prompts behave the same regardless of what you write them in. What differs is how much the SDK does for you, how schemas get declared, and whether the library is officially maintained at all.

LanguageSDKStatusInstall
Python modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk (FastMCP) Official pip install mcp
TypeScript modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk Official npm install @modelcontextprotocol/sdk zod
Go modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk Official go get github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk
Java modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk Official Maven: io.modelcontextprotocol.sdk:mcp
C# modelcontextprotocol/csharp-sdk Official dotnet add package ModelContextProtocol
Rust modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk (rmcp) Official cargo add rmcp
Ruby community SDKs Community gem install mcp
PHP community SDKs Community composer require ...

Which one should you use?

Whichever your API is already written in. An MCP server is a thin wrapper over code you have, and splitting it across runtimes buys you nothing but a deployment to maintain. If you are genuinely starting fresh, Python and TypeScript have the most mature SDKs and by far the most examples to copy from.

The one case where language choice matters on its own: Ruby and PHP have no SDK under modelcontextprotocol, so you are relying on community ports whose currency you should check before building on them.

What is the same in every language

Tool descriptions decide whether the agent behaves, and no SDK writes those for you. They are read by the model rather than by your team, and they are re-sent on every request — so they are both the accuracy problem and the cost problem. Every page here ends in the same place for that reason.

Related tools

None of it is visible to your customers

Everything here is for the person building the server. MCP Showcase is for everyone else: point it at any MCP endpoint and it produces a live playground with documentation for every tool, so evaluating your server takes a click rather than a checkout and a build.

Frequently asked questions

The one your API is already written in — an MCP server is a thin wrapper over code you have, and splitting it across runtimes buys nothing. If you are starting fresh, Python and TypeScript have the most mature SDKs and by far the most examples.

Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, C# and Rust have SDKs under modelcontextprotocol, with C# maintained jointly with Microsoft. Ruby and PHP rely on community projects, which vary in how closely they track the spec.

Not the protocol surface — tools, resources and prompts are the same everywhere. What differs is how schemas are declared, how the transport is set up, and how much of the boilerplate the SDK writes for you.

It depends on how current it is. The protocol has moved quickly, especially on transports, and a port that stopped tracking revisions will connect to some clients and not others. Check the last spec revision it followed before committing.

Run the deployed URL through the MCP Inspector to confirm the handshake and see the tool list, or the MCP Server Tester for the same thing as a pass/fail checklist. Both work against any language.

More free MCP tools